Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Mixing Meloxicam With Excedrin

Letter Michele Calzavara

The City Council majority Calzavara, coordinator of the club altinate of PD (for me just Michael, since nearly 20 years we shared the landing, in Armstrong ...) writes to me asking to publish a letter of clarification on the City Council of March 23 .

I do it willingly - even though the purpose of my blog is not to publish the texts of others, because it is not a newspaper but a personal website - because the talk has to do with the my last post (where which has already been published a text of others).

In doing so I must clarify that NOT agree with most of the letter . Michael knows this, Did I wrote in response to his email, but I will not say more because it is right that everyone makes their opinion .


OF THE CITY COUNCIL March 23, 2010

considers it necessary for me to make some remarks to the council of 23 March concerning the petition filed by the directors of minority and signed by 1130 citizens on issues that for some 'time are discussed that is, in order of presentation: the sports hall, out of the loop, closure of street station and bridge over the river Sile.

I was sorry to leave before this council, but work commitments forced me to abandon mandatory discussion. I was sorry for the levels of assistance from the minority councilors, for the umpteenth time, seasoned with their phrases and insinuations jokes that have no basis of truth, but are used to support the argument that we are dealing with a majority that does not take into account the proposals that come from other, much less take account of the collection of signatures and committees up to here fate, painting all members of the majority as the irresponsible people who make policies to support the few that always have a dual purpose in that they do. I

this kind of politics I'm not: respect for the people must come first. The comparison must never go on the offense or worse sull'insinuazione staff: do minority is difficult, but this does not justify doing battles, starting from considerations untrue and systematically putting in doubt what the majority says.

This lack of trust until the claims made here is something as serious as incorrect because, you see, the public acts are formal, the rumors are only good at the bar.

and continue to support the talk I think it is a wrong operation.

I am also the coordinator of the Democratic Party two years and even more for this role I have the greatest respect for all, I have always tried to present things as they are, I made the dialogue the way I do politics. They know the citizens of Via Pascoli I met several times and to whom I gave my approval to resolve the problem, having in mind, however, that my first goal is to ensure the common good, when you administer a country there are children and stepchildren.

But my proposal does not solve the problem immediately and we must be patient: they preferred to listen to those who have suffered from the illusion that things would have unfolded differently, and that his interest would have been decisive. Without understanding that such involvement was intended to broaden their personal consent. The public interest in such conduct, is much later, if it ever arrives.

My position on the matter relating to the sports hall is that in this term which ends in 2011, the administration does not proceed with the sale. The approval of the variants of alienation and inclusion in the plan does not mean that it is mandatory and / or automated processing will proceed with the sale, but that remains open the opportunity for improving the availability of sports facilities with a view to future growth needs of sports facilities for citizens. This will be assessed in the future, taking into account the needs of the community and financial resources that today are not conceivable also considered the serious economic crisis.

The road out of the loop will see a definitive answer with the construction of additional works included in the ring together the changes planned in the area of \u200b\u200bthe old highway exit: the problems were created by the opening of the new see-through solution.

It will take some 'time because it's complex infrastructure projects that involve many institutions and the achievement of which must be carried out the correct legal procedures.

The Way Station, there is no doubt, had a decline in the pass-through traffic after the closure of level crossing closure widely expected since the first MoU was signed in 1993. On this administration can not do anything, the businesses will have to deal with this new reality that will certainly penalize but is now a fact. But

new perspectives opened up by the drop in traffic, in addition to the undoubted environmental benefits. Via Stazione, with the new square, it can become a road to measure citizen for a new lifestyle center that will be supported and strengthened to increase the quality of life.

But I believe that critical economic situation in the closure of the street station on weekdays may result in further damage to economic activities and therefore should be avoided.

The Bridge on the River Sile I think the clearest example of how to use the minority for political demagoguery. Everybody understand that the situation of the bridge from a static point of view is not the best: the bridge is 100 years old and the Mayor, as his institutional duty, it was concerned about the safety of its citizens by making a static of the bridge to get to know the real conditions. We often complain that no one is prevention, disasters happen and are often widely expected but then why when someone does the work of prevention is criticized? The safety of all good is not worth any discomfort?

I believe that those who hold institutional roles can not do their duty without taking into account the common good: administering means to protect the public interest, the welfare of the individual must be balanced with the welfare of the community and the citizens should have this attitude towards the problems, without considering the defense of his personal situation as paramount.

A community can also be recognized by this and the political class in this country it must take account of the public interest comes before our personal success and precise responsibilities of the administrator is not to be used in a demagogic problems to seek consent to political means to do a service to others. These

my comments, I'd like to do in city council, do so through this letter, hoping to give my contribution to make to Quarto d'Altino a better country.

Regards. Michele Calzavara


City Councillor Civic Altinate

Friday, March 26, 2010

How Many Calories Does Vegetable Have

OPEN LETTER TO PD

the City Council Tuesday night (March 23, 2010), which was discussed in the joint petition (signed by 1106 residents of Quarto d'Altino) against the closure Via the sale of the station and the Palace, and for the solution of problems related to the road bridge over the Sile and the traffic from passing, the concept that I heard most was that of TRANSPARENCY in opposed to the ideal of political expediency . (A report signed by Marta can be found on the Arctic Nuova Venezia March 25 )

The system is this for political expediency who was called upon to administer our country some things we keep hidden , or reveals only partially, so that it can take time, explore the reactions of citizens, save face by any bad impression etc.

This is an unfortunately widespread practice , not just locally. So one might shrug and say, 'xe tuto el world country. "

But no: there must be a change if (because it will be sooner or later ...) and this change will have to go right for TRANSPARENCY , which has now become synonymous with DEMOCRACY, as the lack of transparency is the enemy of PARTICIPATION, PARTICIPATION and there can be no true democracy.

stated many times in a year that is being relied a study on the viability of the town center, then go with whom to discuss with the citizens on whether to shut off station, to then be know that there have never been the money to do so - this is an example where political expediency triumphs over transparency.

Hold "hidden" in a letter which Autovie Venetian agrees to find a solution that removes the traffic from passing through the village from the town - this is an example that political expediency triumphs over transparency.

say that there is no intention to sell the area of \u200b\u200bthe Palace (track and green space included), when in fact since 2003 have systematically created the conditions in the future because someone can build on it 40 / 50 apartments - this is an example where the political opportunity wins the transparency (or of political schizophrenia, you see).

Stating that the decision to buy dall'ATER 10 garage under the new Piazza San Michele (about € 220 thousand) is dictated by the desire to shelter the car of the town, only to learn that the mouth of un'assessore ATER said "or buy all, or do not do anything " - this is an example where political expediency wins transparency.

Promise for 7 years a solution to the demolition of the seat of the music courses then be a few months from when the bulldozers to make do without having to rely on some help from the administration (ie the community) - this is an example where the political opportunity wins on transparency (and is also a case on which I shall return later, by force of circumstances).

guess that is not easy to make the public administrator, but actually relatively small as ours. Not for this, however, difficulties have to find refuge behind of mirrors, glass mat, fifth . We are all human with our limitations: let's face instead of hiding behind a finger. Because in the end, all the chickens come home to roost, and when the citizen becomes aware that he was teased lose confidence not only to the person who has betrayed him, but to the overall system . Arrival

then the title of this article, or to open letter to the PD . What is not in what I've written so far, but rather in a real letter that a group of citizens has signed and sent in recent days to the regional and provincial levels of the Democratic Party just to bring attention to this aspect lack of transparency with regard to citizenship and the same lack of involvement in decisions affecting the whole community , perpetrated by people who represent the party at local level.

I have received - as the jargon - with prayer for the dissemination and spread.


Dear
Provincial Directorate
Regional
Democratic Party

Dear Sirs, we are close to

election of 28/29 March 2010, by which we citizens will be called to express our preference to several candidates for the Veneto Region.

As citizens of Quarto d'Altino, we can not express our disappointment with the choices made by the municipal government, several components of which are members of the Democratic Party. In recent times we have tried in various ways - including the popular petitions - to combat, with no result, decisions concerning the scope for aggregation, land conservation, roads. How

citizenship and unheard yet convinced that the vote remained the only way to evaluate the performance of the various administrators that follow, we invite you to always have a clear position taken by your local representatives, for their work away by the people and their problems, their inability to involve the citizens on issues critical to the development of their country can only impact on the consensus at the political level at least the provincial, regional.

We believe that the administration of the town of Quarto d'Altino the Democratic Party and its leaders have expressed the most complete unwillingness to review decisions taken even in the face of important numbers, which in the annex provides the details.

More seriously believe that the circle of the Democratic Party of Quarto d'Altino has bravely taken a clear position in front of the lively protest on issues of citizenship mentioned above.

This is clearly contrary to the spirit of transparency and participation in the Statute of the much-ballyhooed Democratic Party.

We believe therefore that it is clearly a fundamental change in attitude towards the problems highlighted by the people, because words alone - or the good intentions unfulfilled - create a distrust and detachment difficult to reconstruct, especially in small communities.

We still important to highlight that many of the signatories of this document can be recognized in the center-left politically and are potential supporters of the Statute of the Democratic Party.

Quarto d'Altino, March 18, 2010