The City Council majority Calzavara, coordinator of the club altinate of PD (for me just Michael, since nearly 20 years we shared the landing, in Armstrong ...) writes to me asking to publish a letter of clarification on the City Council of March 23 .
I do it willingly - even though the purpose of my blog is not to publish the texts of others, because it is not a newspaper but a personal website - because the talk has to do with the my last post (where which has already been published a text of others).
In doing so I must clarify that NOT agree with most of the letter . Michael knows this, Did I wrote in response to his email, but I will not say more because it is right that everyone makes their opinion .
OF THE CITY COUNCIL March 23, 2010
considers it necessary for me to make some remarks to the council of 23 March concerning the petition filed by the directors of minority and signed by 1130 citizens on issues that for some 'time are discussed that is, in order of presentation: the sports hall, out of the loop, closure of street station and bridge over the river Sile.
I was sorry to leave before this council, but work commitments forced me to abandon mandatory discussion. I was sorry for the levels of assistance from the minority councilors, for the umpteenth time, seasoned with their phrases and insinuations jokes that have no basis of truth, but are used to support the argument that we are dealing with a majority that does not take into account the proposals that come from other, much less take account of the collection of signatures and committees up to here fate, painting all members of the majority as the irresponsible people who make policies to support the few that always have a dual purpose in that they do. I
this kind of politics I'm not: respect for the people must come first. The comparison must never go on the offense or worse sull'insinuazione staff: do minority is difficult, but this does not justify doing battles, starting from considerations untrue and systematically putting in doubt what the majority says.
This lack of trust until the claims made here is something as serious as incorrect because, you see, the public acts are formal, the rumors are only good at the bar.
and continue to support the talk I think it is a wrong operation.
I am also the coordinator of the Democratic Party two years and even more for this role I have the greatest respect for all, I have always tried to present things as they are, I made the dialogue the way I do politics. They know the citizens of Via Pascoli I met several times and to whom I gave my approval to resolve the problem, having in mind, however, that my first goal is to ensure the common good, when you administer a country there are children and stepchildren.
But my proposal does not solve the problem immediately and we must be patient: they preferred to listen to those who have suffered from the illusion that things would have unfolded differently, and that his interest would have been decisive. Without understanding that such involvement was intended to broaden their personal consent. The public interest in such conduct, is much later, if it ever arrives.
My position on the matter relating to the sports hall is that in this term which ends in 2011, the administration does not proceed with the sale. The approval of the variants of alienation and inclusion in the plan does not mean that it is mandatory and / or automated processing will proceed with the sale, but that remains open the opportunity for improving the availability of sports facilities with a view to future growth needs of sports facilities for citizens. This will be assessed in the future, taking into account the needs of the community and financial resources that today are not conceivable also considered the serious economic crisis.
The road out of the loop will see a definitive answer with the construction of additional works included in the ring together the changes planned in the area of \u200b\u200bthe old highway exit: the problems were created by the opening of the new see-through solution.
It will take some 'time because it's complex infrastructure projects that involve many institutions and the achievement of which must be carried out the correct legal procedures.
The Way Station, there is no doubt, had a decline in the pass-through traffic after the closure of level crossing closure widely expected since the first MoU was signed in 1993. On this administration can not do anything, the businesses will have to deal with this new reality that will certainly penalize but is now a fact. But
new perspectives opened up by the drop in traffic, in addition to the undoubted environmental benefits. Via Stazione, with the new square, it can become a road to measure citizen for a new lifestyle center that will be supported and strengthened to increase the quality of life.
But I believe that critical economic situation in the closure of the street station on weekdays may result in further damage to economic activities and therefore should be avoided.
The Bridge on the River Sile I think the clearest example of how to use the minority for political demagoguery. Everybody understand that the situation of the bridge from a static point of view is not the best: the bridge is 100 years old and the Mayor, as his institutional duty, it was concerned about the safety of its citizens by making a static of the bridge to get to know the real conditions. We often complain that no one is prevention, disasters happen and are often widely expected but then why when someone does the work of prevention is criticized? The safety of all good is not worth any discomfort?
I believe that those who hold institutional roles can not do their duty without taking into account the common good: administering means to protect the public interest, the welfare of the individual must be balanced with the welfare of the community and the citizens should have this attitude towards the problems, without considering the defense of his personal situation as paramount.
A community can also be recognized by this and the political class in this country it must take account of the public interest comes before our personal success and precise responsibilities of the administrator is not to be used in a demagogic problems to seek consent to political means to do a service to others. These
my comments, I'd like to do in city council, do so through this letter, hoping to give my contribution to make to Quarto d'Altino a better country.
Regards. Michele Calzavara
City Councillor Civic Altinate
0 comments:
Post a Comment